🏡 New High Court Ruling: Property Inherited After 1956 Is Not Ancestral — Children Have No Birthright

 A recent judgment by the Punjab & Haryana High Court has cleared one of the biggest confusions in family property matters:

👉 If a father inherits property after 1956, that property becomes his own property.

Children do NOT get any automatic birthright in it.

This decision has huge implications for thousands of families who fight over “ancestral land” without understanding what is truly ancestral under law.

Let’s break it down in the simplest and most relatable way.

---

🕰️ 1. Why 1956 Is Such a Big Deal?

In 1956, the Government of India introduced the Hindu Succession Act, which changed how inherited property is treated.

Before 1956:

• Property inherited by a Hindu male from his father/grandfather was considered ancestral.

• Children were considered coparceners and got a share from birth.

After 1956:

• Property inherited through succession does NOT automatically become ancestral.

• It becomes self-acquired in the father’s hands.

This is where most misunderstandings arise.

---

⚖️ 2. What the High Court Said (In Simple Words)

The Court said:

👉 If your father inherited property after 1956, you cannot claim that it is ancestral land.

👉 You cannot demand a birthright or stop him from selling, gifting, or transferring it.

👉 It is his exclusive property, just like property he purchased himself.

The judgment was passed in a case where a father inherited land in the 1960s. Children claimed it was ancestral.

The Court rejected this claim.

---

👨‍👦 3. Why It Is NOT Ancestral Property?

Because after 1956:

• Inherited property does not become joint family property automatically.

• If female heirs such as mother, sister, etc., were present at the time of inheritance, survivorship does not apply.

• The father gets the land as an individual heir — not as a coparcener.

Therefore:

➡️ No coparcenary = No birthright for children.

---

🧠 4. Real-Life Example (Easy to Understand)

Imagine this:

• Your grandfather died in 1970.

• Your father inherited his 6 kanal land.

You might think: “This is ancestral land. We have a share.”

But legally:

❌ No. This is NOT ancestral land.

✔️ It is your father’s self-acquired property — because inheritance happened after 1956.

---

💥 5. What This Means for Families Today

This judgment brings clarity to family disputes:

✔️ Children cannot stop their father from selling inherited land

Unless it is ancestral (which is rare after 1956), children have no legal right to interfere.

✔️ Property inherited after 1956 is fully under the father’s control

He can sell, gift, mortgage, or make a will — without children’s consent.

✔️ Helps reduce unnecessary litigation

Many property cases arise only because people mistakenly believe “Hume toh janam se hissedari hai.”

This ruling clears that misconception.

---

📌 6. What Counts as True Ancestral Property?

To be ancestral:

• The property must have passed undivided for four generations (great-grandfather → grandfather → father → you).

• It should not have been divided or inherited through succession.

Most properties today do not qualify.

---

📚 7. Why This Matters for J&K Viewers

In Jammu & Kashmir, many families still use terms like:

• Bap-Dada di zameen

• Shajra Nasab

• Ancestral land share

But after reading this, you can check:

👉 Was the inheritance after 1956?

If yes → NOT ancestral.

This prevents:

• wrong mutation claims

• false partition demands

• unnecessary family fights

• illegal objections during sale

---

💬 8. Key Takeaway for JKRevenueGyaan Readers

⭐ Not every inherited land is ancestral land.

⭐ After 1956, inherited land = father’s personal property.

⭐ Children get no automatic share unless there is a will or settlement.

This judgment gives families clarity and helps avoid misunderstandings that often turn into court cases.