Skip to main content

Featured

🚨 Meri Zameen Kisi Aur Ke Naam Kaise Ho Gayi?!

A Panic Story Turned Into a Simple Legal Solution Under J&K Land Revenue Act Imagine this: You visit the Patwari office one normal day to get a simple Fard for a bank loan… The Patwari looks at your Khasra number… hesitates… types again… looks confused… then says quietly: “Bhaisahab, iss zameen ka mutation toh kisi aur ke naam chadha hua hai.” ⛔ Your heart drops. ⛔ Your mind goes blank. ⛔ A cold fear grips you. “YEH KAB HO GAYA? KAISAY HO GAYA? AUR MUJHE BATAYA BHI NAHIN?!” It feels like a nightmare — your own land, your own property, silently transferred to someone else through a wrong mutation , and you came to know years later . 😨 Panic Mode: What People Usually Think (and Why It’s WRONG) Whenever someone discovers a wrong or fraudulent mutation, most people: ❌ Run to the Patwari again and again ❌ File complaints to Tehsildar / Naib Tehsildar ❌ Think they must go to Police or Vigilance ❌ Fear long court cases and “stay orders” ❌ Get stressed into giving money to middle...

🚨 When Power Meets Responsibility: What the MLA vs DC Doda Controversy Teaches Us About Law, Conduct, and Governance in J&K

MLA DODA MEHRAJ MALIK VS DC DODA PSA

In recent weeks, the political landscape of Jammu & Kashmir witnessed a storm of controversy. MLA Mehraj Malik from Doda stirred outrage by posting highly derogatory and abusive comments targeting the District Commissioner (DC) of Doda on a public social media platform. The post not only shocked citizens but also strained the relationship between elected representatives and government officials.

MLA DODA MEHRAJ MALIK VS DC DODA PSA

In an exceptional administrative response, the DC invoked the Public Safety Act (PSA) to book the MLA, citing threats to public order. While the PSA provides a preventive mechanism in extraordinary situations, it raises a crucial question:

👉 What happens when lower-level government employees or ordinary citizens face similar attacks, and PSA is not applicable?

This blog post delves deep into the legal framework of Jammu & Kashmir, focusing on the newly enacted Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and the Public Safety Act (PSA). It provides practical guidance to government officials, citizens, and political representatives, empowering them to navigate such controversies lawfully, ethically, and effectively.


🌐 The Shift from IPC & CrPC to BNSS & BNS: A Brief Overview

Historically, India’s criminal justice system was governed by the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).
However, in a significant reform, Jammu & Kashmir adopted the BNSS and BNS laws in 2023, replacing the outdated IPC/CrPC framework.

The Public Safety Act (PSA) continues to exist as a special preventive law in Jammu & Kashmir, allowing authorities to detain individuals without trial if they are perceived as a threat to public order or security.

👉 Key Distinction:

  • BNSS and BNS handle criminal offenses procedurally.

  • PSA provides a preventive, administrative option for exceptional cases of threat to public order.




⚖️ Legal Provisions Under BNSS & BNS

MLA VS DC PSA

📜 1. Defamation and Insult

  • BNS, Section 352
    Insult with intent to provoke a breach of public peace.

  • BNS, Section 356
    Defamation via false or malicious statements damaging a person’s reputation.
    → Penalty: Up to 2 years imprisonment, fine, or both.


📜 2. Public Mischief

  • BNSS, Section 163
    Issuing prohibitory orders to prevent mischief, particularly misuse of social media.

  • BNS, Section 353
    Spreading false information or rumors with intent to cause public mischief.


📜 3. Insult to Public Servant

  • BNS, Section 267
    Intentionally insulting a public servant in the execution of their duty.
    → Penalty: Imprisonment up to 6 months, fine up to ₹5,000, or both.


📜 4. Criminal Intimidation

  • BNS, Section 351
    Threatening injury to a person, reputation, or property to cause alarm or compel unlawful action.
    → Penalty: Up to 2 years imprisonment, fine, or both.


📜 5. Public Safety Act (PSA)

  • PSA, Section 8:
    Permits detention of a person up to 2 years without trial if they are perceived to be a threat to public order or state security.

  • When Used in This Case:
    MLA Mehraj Malik was booked under PSA for using derogatory and inflammatory remarks against a public official, which were seen as disturbing public peace.

👉 Important Note:
While PSA is a preventive measure for serious cases, it should NOT be the first option. BNSS & BNS criminal provisions provide a clear legal path for addressing defamation, insult, intimidation, and mischief.


🚨 Real-Life Application: What Should Government Officials Do?

✅ Step-by-Step Legal Approach

  1. Document the Offense
    ➔ Take screenshots, record URLs, and preserve timestamps of abusive posts or threatening messages.

  2. File a Complaint
    ➔ Official FIR under applicable BNSS/BNS sections:

    • Defamation → Section 356 BNS

    • Insult → Section 352 BNS

    • Public Mischief → Sections 163 BNSS & 353 BNS

    • Insult to Public Servant → Section 267 BNS

    • Criminal Intimidation → Section 351 BNS

  3. PSA as Last Resort
    ➔ In extraordinary cases of public disorder, PSA (Section 8) may be invoked by the DC, but NOT for routine cases.

  4. Maintain Professionalism
    ➔ Avoid engaging in public rebuttals; let the legal system handle the matter.

  5. Report Internally
    ➔ Inform superiors and the administrative hierarchy to ensure institutional support.

  6. Consult Legal Experts
    ➔ Understand the full legal scope and proceed accordingly.


📢 Responsible Conduct Guide for Citizens & MLAs

👥 Citizens

  • ✔️ Freedom of speech is bound by Article 19(1)(a) and reasonable restrictions.

  • ✔️ Defamation → File complaint under BNS Section 356.

  • ✔️ Spreading rumors → Penal under BNS Section 353.

🏛️ MLAs & Public Representatives

  • ✔️ Criticize policies—not individuals.

  • ✔️ Avoid inflammatory posts violating BNSS Section 350, BNS Section 267, or BNS Section 351.

  • ✔️ Criminal intimidation of officials leads to legal action under BNS Section 351.


✅ Example Scenario Table

Scenario Legal Provision Recommended Action


MLA abuses Tehsildar online
BNSS Section 350 + BNS Section 267 + BNS Section 356 Complaint to police + Civil defamation suit


Citizen spreads false rumors about DC
BNS Section 353 + BNSS Section 163 FIR + Prohibitory order


Threatening public official online
BNS Section 351 + BNS Section 267 FIR under criminal intimidation + Administrative escalation


Inciting public unrest targeting DC
BNSS Section 163 + BNS Section 353 Prohibitory order + Police action


In extreme public order threat
PSA, Section 8 Preventive detention up to 2 years

🌟 Conclusion: Lawful Action Is The True Power

The MLA vs DC Doda controversy teaches us that democracy thrives when guided by law—not personal vendettas or emotional reactions.

✅ Government officials should follow BNSS, BNS, and PSA provisions with professionalism.
✅ Citizens and MLAs must understand that responsible speech is essential for democratic health.
✅ Insult, defamation, intimidation, and public mischief carry strict punishments under BNSS Sections 350, 163 and BNS Sections 356, 267, 351, 353, while PSA serves as a preventive extreme measure.

MLA VS DC PSA


📚 Stay informed. Stay empowered.
Bookmark JKRevenueGyaan for continuous updates on legal solutions and governance best practices in Jammu & Kashmir.



Comments